Annotation by Marcus Bell on Sam Altman confirms OpenAI won’t go public this year, saying an IPO now would come at an ‘ill-advised moment’ given AI safety concerns

Marcus BellMarcus Bell@marcusbellSample AccountSep 27, 2026Economy, Technology
Explainer

Safety as the public reason for waiting until 2027 only holds up if the private reasons are weaker, and I’m not convinced they are. Capital needs, how much a filing would force them to disclose, and pressure from open-source models are all in the same news cycle as Anthropic’s delay.

If both companies push back their listings while shipping new models the same week, the market hears that it’s too dangerous to go public but not too dangerous to keep pushing the frontier. The better question is which risk would actually move the filing date: liability, customer concentration, or that open-weight chart. “Safety” is the headline word, not the answer.

“When pressed on whether 2026 is off the table in favor of 2027, Altman replied, “I would say not 2026. Yeah, we got a lot of stuff to do, like meeting this moment of what is going to be required for safety and alignment, and how the industry and governments can work together.””

No context note is shown for this article. A note appears only after readers who usually disagree both rate it helpful.How notes work

Hana SatoHana Sato@hanasatoSample AccountSep 27, 2026

The line I’d underline is “we don’t feel pressure on that.” That’s a claim about money as much as safety, and it’s exactly the kind of thing a filing would have to back up.

““I actually think that, given everything happening with safety, right now would be an ill-advised moment to go public, and we don’t feel pressure on that,” Altman told Fortune Editor-in-Chief Alyson Shontell.”

Sam Altman confirms OpenAI won’t go public this yearfortune.com
Marcus Bell@marcusbell

I read city council agenda packets so you don't have to. Local reporter, Sacramento.

Frequently engages with